home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
- Path: new-news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!jet
- From: jet@eskimo.com (James Thiele)
- Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++?
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eskimo.com
- Message-ID: <DpM43n.A3z@eskimo.com>
- Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id)
- Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever
- References: <DpG1s1.GC9@research.att.com> <4k7akk$nsh@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <4kbfnf$1bu@news1.is.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 20:40:33 GMT
-
- In article <4kbfnf$1bu@news1.is.net> mvantassel@teambca.com (Mark VanTassel) writes:
- >linden@positive.eng.sun.com (Peter van der Linden) wrote:
- >
- >>My personal belief is that C++ has peaked and will now go into a steady
- >>decline. But lets see some metrics proposed for measuring this.
- >>Everyone's got an opinion ;-)
- >
- >I don't have any metrics, per se - just an observation that "C" had
- >remained "king of the hill" for several decades, refusing to be budged
- >by any of DOZENS of "new and improved" languages...
-
- *several decades*? Not really. C was invented around 1970. It only
- existed on UNIX and a few IBM and Honeywell systems in 1975 (look at the
- Bell System Technical Journal special edition on UNIX if you don't
- believe me).
-
- In the 1976 time frame, *two* decades ago, UNIX was rare, only a few
- hundred installations at most, so C had penetrated to no more than a
- thousand (generously) systems at that time. Even back in those ancient
- times there were tens of thousands of computer sites in industry and
- universities, with C on only a few percent.
-
- In 1976 FORTRAN and COBOL were on a much higher percentage of computer
- sites than C.
-
- C was not "king of the hill" anywhere except on UNIX before the
- 80s. In my dictionary "several" is more than one and a half.
-
- IMHO your observation of history is wrong.
-
- Hope this throws some gasoline on the argument,
- James Thiele
- jet@eskimo.com
- http://www.eskimo.com/~jet
-